On Wednesday, the Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center released a report on this topic exactly. The report, Moving Target: Pennsylvania’s Flawed Implementation of the Voter ID Law, asks the question: “How is PennDOT handling the new Department of State ID?” The answer, in layman’s terms, is simple: Not so good.
Seven months after the law was enacted, PennDOT offices still do not all have information about the Voter ID Law, including a poster prepared by the Department of State and basic fact sheets for voters to take.
Worse, we went looking for information about the new Department of State voting ID, and we couldn’t find any. The only information that was available was a press release on the topic issued on July 20 — and to get it you had to ask for it.
PBPC partnered with SEIU staff who conducted observations and interviews in 44 PennDOT driver’s license centers between Sept. 10 and 17. They asked PennDOT staff what voters had to do if they wanted a voter ID and if a person who lacked certain documentation could still get an ID.
Across the state, in one-third of the cases, the staff never mentioned the Department of State ID. In close to half the cases, PennDOT staff gave information that was wrong, including telling observers that they would have to pay for the PennDOT ID.
In the most surprising finding, PennDOT staff indicated they would discourage people from getting a Department of State ID because it could only be used for voting purposes. Well, yeah, that was the whole point.
-
-
blog advertising is good for you -
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Helene Karpiel on Bill Peduto Was the Only Mayoral Candidate to Respond to Hill District Survey
- Helene Karpiel on Bill Peduto Was the Only Mayoral Candidate to Respond to Hill District Survey
- Randall Myers on Upgrade SEPTA Regional Rail to Rapid Transit Standards to Solve the Engineer Shortage
- Jon Geeting on Upgrade SEPTA Regional Rail to Rapid Transit Standards to Solve the Engineer Shortage
- John Harvey on You Knew It Was Coming: Corbett Trots Out the Out-of-Context Defense on Latino Comments
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
Categories

Speculation is that Judge Simpson is trying to figure out a way to save the law by “tweaking” the provisional ballot portion only. I guess the judge couldn’t figure out when the case was remanded to him with specific instructions to enjoin if even 1 person was disenfranchised that the Supreme Court was telling him he got it wrong. I wonder if Judge Simpson is channelling Homer Simpson…