Goodbye pay raise

After four months of unprecedented public outcry and a voter rage that cost a state Supreme Court justice his job, the General Assembly is on the verge of fully repealing last summer's pay raises.

The state House voted 197-1 on Monday to send a full repeal of the legislative, judicial and executive raises to the Senate, which is set to act on Wednesday.

The House vote comes after a week of negotiations that saw the two chambers butt heads over how best to reduce judicial salaries without running afoul of the state Constitution.

Legislators can't cut judges' pay ''unless by law applying generally to all salaried officers.'' The clause was designed to protect the judiciary from political reprisals by the General Assembly.

Legislative leaders said the House-approved compromise language addresses that requirement by making it clear that the repeal applies to all three branches of government affected by the raise.

''It is our best effort to put forth what I believe is the intent of the House and Senate and to state [that] as clearly as possible,'' said House Majority Leader Sam Smith, R-Jefferson.

Both the Senate and Gov. Ed Rendell are expected to sign off on the compromise language, which would return legislative pay to its pre-July levels.

Before the raise, lawmakers made a base salary of $69,047. But the raise bill tied legislative wages and others to a percentage of what's paid at the federal level. Legislators, for instance, were to receive half the pay of a U.S. congressman.

To the consternation of reformers, however, the march back in time also means legislators still will receive annual cost-of-living adjustments to their salaries.

On Monday morning, activists called on the General Assembly to eliminate the cost-of-living adjustments and pay back the early raises that many lawmakers took through so-called ''unvouchered expense'' payments.

At least one prominent Republican â€

Filed under:

Re: Goodbye pay raise

Interesting. Hopefully a primary challenger emerges, due to Beaver being safe Dem territory.

Re: Goodbye pay raise

Any idea on who the lone dissenter was?

Re: Goodbye pay raise

I’m going to post the person who dissented on the next post, but I“m going to ask you to take a guess. Take a wild guess!

Re: Goodbye pay raise

Who did you guess… was it Bill DeWeese? Nope. He relented. Was it John Perzel? If you guessed Perzel, shame on you. He’s the Speaker of the House, he can only vote in the event of a tie.

It was Mike Veon. Yeah, that’s right. Mike Veon. You have to admire his tenacity, but perhaps everybody now sees why I don’t trust him, inspite of the good language he can put to Democratic values.

Re: Goodbye pay raise

They’re so concerned with not “funning afoul” of the state constitution when it comes to the judicial pay, however where was all the concern for the state constitution back on July 7? Such a joke.

Re: Goodbye pay raise

There is a challenger that emerged during the summer. He doesn’t appear to be too credible at this point, but with votes like this, he soon might become credible.

Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <img> <div class="pullquote">
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • You can use Textile markup to format text.

More information about formatting options

We’ve developed a participation policy to help guide the tone of discussion in our community. Please read it to learn more about participating in Keystone Politics.