Reps Manderino and Taylor introduce "fair share" health care bill


Taylor and Manderino Announce PA Health Care Accessibility and Insurance Responsibility (PHAIR) Act

Rep. John Taylor (R-Philadelphia) and Rep. Kathy Manderino (D-Philadelphia) announced legislation to ensure that working Pennsylvanians employed by large, profitable businesses in the Commonwealth are provided health insurance coverage for themselves and their family by their employer.

The legislative proposal comes in response to a recent study which found that on a nationwide basis, taxpayers were forced to come up with $8 billion in order to provide state-sponsored health coverage to workers lacking employer-based coverage.

“Our Medicaid system was not meant to be a free health care program for corporations who want to maximize profits by denying health care coverage to their employees,

Filed under:

Re: Reps Manderino and Taylor introduce "fair share" health care

I agree with Philly Dem. I wish that the responsibility would be born on more than just the large companies, but all of them. A full 33% of our children are obese, diabetes costs have tripled since 1998 and we are no longer providing preventative, health care – but rather “sick” care, and doing a lousy job of it.

Re: Reps Manderino and Taylor introduce "fair share" health care

It appears to be one of the more sensible proposals I’ve seen dealing with health insurance, but a large question for me is exactly how many workers that aren’t covered by large employers actually end up on Medicaid, as opposed to forgoing any health coverage at all? Uninsured workers must be offered some sort of coverage (or have it “mandated” upon them by government, i.e. Massachusetts), but the possibility exists that employers will be forced to pay coverage costs for employees they don’t have. Otherwise, the proposal seems fine.

Re: Reps Manderino and Taylor introduce "fair share" health care

First, many retail establishments hire workers, but don’t give them enough “hours” for the workers to qualify as eligible for benefits. (30 hrs/wk is considered “full time” by many retailers.) Second, even if you do get enough hours to qualify for benefits, the insurance offered is simply too expensive to enrol in given the low hourly wages.

pd

Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <img> <div class="pullquote">
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • You can use Textile markup to format text.

More information about formatting options

We’ve developed a participation policy to help guide the tone of discussion in our community. Please read it to learn more about participating in Keystone Politics.