House Looks to Borrow $850M for Clean Energy

The state House on Tuesday voted in favor of borrowing $850 million to encourage use of cleaner energy sources, a main element of Gov. Ed Rendell’s energy strategy.

The 126-74 vote sent the bill to the Senate, which late last year approved a different version that requires much less borrowing.

The House bill’s sponsor, Rep. Eugene DePasquale, D-York, called it ‘‘an across-the-board, strong economic development, environmental protection bill.’‘

Filed under:

Colossal waste of money.

Colossal waste of money. Legislators will do anything to avoid solving a problem. They could use this money to get some nuclear reactors, and lower electricity costs, but they prefer the sure-to-fail alternatives of wind and bio-fuel.
Too bad engineers can’t get elected to office instead of lawyers and politically correct do-gooders who simply don’t know how to do basic BTU calculations.

Nuclear?

Yeah, right, where are the feds on finding a suitable spot to store all that nuclear waste? If I recall the feds keep blowing their own deadlines on this.

Come on, it’s flawed. Simplistic, consequence free BTU calculations on costs alone is not going to cut it. Let’s start the ball rolling on investment and innovation in CLEAN sources of energy.

I do understand your point on cost, that is why the Federal Government needs an energy policy that is ahead of the states. The entire southwest is a prime location for sustainable solar. It’ll still be an sizable investment to set up compressed air storage facilities and a suitable DC transmission grid to allow for solar, but it will get us off oil and be clean.

Pa can’t do it alone, no matter want DePasquale thinks. So you are right, let’s start electing some engineers!

To: Anon above

Thank you for acknowledging the major flaw with nuclear energy. It will definitely be part of the mix as America attempts to kick the foriegn oil habit and diversify its energy portfolio, but too many believe nuclear is the sole solution to our energy woes.

Also, you make an excellent point about the southwest being a great place for solar farms. Who knows, if Pennsylvania passes legislation to invest in alternative energy production, those solar panels may be produced right in our backyard.

JM

A Responsible Proposal

I’m not sure I’m all that crazy over this state going nearly a billion dollars deeper into debt, but the potential rewards of “clean” energy clearly outweigh any potential risk. I’m keeping my fingers crossed that the projections for job creation and private investment given by the bill’s sponsors pan out, as Pennsylvania literally cannot afford any more pricey, idealistically-driven proposals that do nothing to solve the problems they were designed to address. However, Rep. Eachus’s energy bill appears to be one of the more rational proposals offered by the Dems in this session, and as a southwestern Pennsylvanian, I can appreciate his vision for this region, once a titan of heavy industry, becoming a national leader in an industry that appears to be emerging as a solid alternative to traditional fossil fuels. Southwestern Pennsylvania needs to find a new economic niche, and clean energy (along with bio-tech) just might be this region’s ticket back to national prominence. The only caveat to all of this, of course, is whether or not the state will end up in the black on this project (or, will taxpayers again see nothing but red?). Rep. Maher’s criticisms of the bill, from a good-government standpoint, are valid. Gov. Rendell should not start doling out grants to favored companies (as has been his method of operation in the past). A competitive, open bidding process would be a great start to keeping costs under control. If successful, this bill could help jumpstart the economy in the southwest (and perhaps nationally) while ultimately saving the taxpayers a few bucks and, just for kicks, help keep our environment a little cleaner (just kidding…). Oh, and we’d be that much closer to telling OPEC where to stick their oil pumps. Not a bad deal at all.

Apologies to Rep. DePasquale

In my post, I attributed the clean-energy proposal to Rep. Eachus. The bill’s sponsor is Rep. DePasquale. As I’m sure all of my posts are read avidly by Democrats in Harrisburg and across the state, I apologize.

To: blackrobe

Rep. Eachus is the prime sponsor of the health care bill, PA ABC or “AdultBasic PLUS”, you articulated on earlier. I agree with many of the points you made concerning the new proposal, but I’d like to hear your take on the information disadvantage within the health care and health insurance industries.

This disavantage on the part of patients, coupled with technology gains in medical field is the main reason health care costs will continue to climb unabated. Also, profit-driven private insurance companies are also at a huge information disadvantage, as they only have small amount of information available about their customers health. For instance what are their eating, exercising, sexual habits??? Basically, both the patient and insurance industry is subject to adverse selection within our health care system. This inevidably leads to higher cost and reduced access.

JM

Post above to Gent, not blackrobe

Forgive me Gent and Blackrobe.

JM

Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <img> <div class="pullquote">
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • You can use Textile markup to format text.

More information about formatting options

We’ve developed a participation policy to help guide the tone of discussion in our community. Please read it to learn more about participating in Keystone Politics.