I understand the concept of free enterprise, and the need for government to get out of business. Privatization is a great thing and brings with it efficiency; however, leasing part of our transportation infrastructure? We need to stop addressing symptoms, and start solving the problem! I will be one to tell you the problem is not low taxes or conservative spending (we have high taxes and debt!)… you know and I know a budget that increases 4.5% year over year, while residents are earning the same is impractical.
If the turnpike lease came at a time when Pennsylvania was fiscally sound, than we may be more inclined to listen. Such a concept was thought up to raise money for an already bloated state spending budget. If the citizens want fiscal responsibility, we are going to have to stop letting this government walk all over us.

-Michael Grant

Having used up all the other ways to find money for roads and bridges the idea to raid the pension funds of retirees and future retirees is an indication of the inability of the legislators to face up to their own shortcomings as good government advocates. I would suggest that they start packing bag lunches from home, walking to work and turning off the lights in Harrisburg when the rooms are empty and turning down the thermostats in winter and doing without air conditioning in summer. They could even forgo health insurance, pension plans and perscription coverage before taking money from the retirees of Penna. Some or all of the things that the retirees will have to do without….Including eating an adequate diet of healthy food.

There are a number of questions surrounding a possible turnpike lease. Among these policy issues are:

1) How high could toll increases really get? 2) How much would tolls need to be increased to achieve the 12.8 billion price? Basically, what is the breakeven point, and profit margin? 3) Could the same economic value be delivered through public financing rather than private sale?

As of this point in time, the public has not had access to all the information. Considering the fact that Pennsylvanians currently own the assest and a majority of us – some 75% – want to retain ownership, I would say the burden of proof rests with the private opperator to justify a lease. Therefore, I hope the Legislature will critically analyze, and exercise caution when discussing the merits of this proposal.

I’m reposting this, as the first is jumbled and difficult to read without correct spacing…

There are a number of questions surrounding a possible turnpike lease. Among these policy issues are:

1) How high could toll increases really get?

2) How much would tolls need to be increased to achieve the 12.8 billion price? (Basically, what is the breakeven point, and profit margin?)

3) Could the same economic value be delivered through public financing rather than private sale?

As of this point in time, the public has not had access to all the information. Considering the fact that Pennsylvanians currently own the assest and a majority of us – some 75% – want to retain ownership, I would say the burden of proof rests with the private opperator to justify a lease. Therefore, I hope the Legislature will critically analyze, and exercise caution when discussing the merits of this proposal.