Considering Regionalization in Pittsburgh

A better question is: what are we consolidating? The answer to that is unclear in a 2004 poll of Pittsburgh Urban Magnet Project members referenced in testimony before last week’s hearing of the Pennsylvania House Urban Affairs Committee. The terms municipal consolidation and regionalism can have multiple meanings; the most important implication of this fact is that CITY-COUNTY CONSOLIDATION IS NOT OUR ONLY OPTION.

Regionalism is the governance of a large geographical area. There are several different types of regionalism, such as fiscal (e.g. tax-base sharing), functional (e.g. shared services) or structural (e.g. consolidation). All of these types of regionalism can have benefits for the geographic area(s) they serve, depending on the details of the specific arrangement…

Filed under:

Consolidation won’t lower

Consolidation won’t lower taxes. It will let those most greedy for power and money get more.

Why will consolidation not

Why will consolidation not lower taxes and how will this allow more money to pass into the hands of the most greedy?
JP

More lobbyists, less government...

Cash-strapped AGH Port Authority wants to spend $400000 on lobbyists..

Same old story. Pennyloafer people.

Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <img> <div class="pullquote">
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • You can use Textile markup to format text.

More information about formatting options

We’ve developed a participation policy to help guide the tone of discussion in our community. Please read it to learn more about participating in Keystone Politics.